Sprinkler Systems Uhaul move Lawn care Roses and trees Ford Parts Chrysler Parts Lake Powell New IPod Touch Apps New IPhone Apps IPhone Apps IPad Information IPad Apps Android APPS Android Games APPS Android Systems Android Tablets APPS and Beyond Smartphone Apps Smartphone Games Apps Repair and Tools Tablet PC Car Sharing Car Leasing Tabler Pc Fly Fishing Toyota Cars Vacation Rentals Stock market NYSE SSE Stock Freight & Shipping News Gluten Lactose Gout My Coupon Life Campgrounds Check Outdoor Kitchen Design and Redoo Bath Remodeling Palm Springs Las Vegas Vacation Tipps Lake Powell Boating Homes for lease Electric and green Car Blog Pearls and diamonds Whatsapp and forget SMS Blog, What is Whatsapp App Solar Panel Solar Energie Sun Power Blog
Fantasy » alt.fan.harry-potter » [OT] I saw it..
[OT] I saw it.. [message #269714] Fr, 19 Mai 2006 05:15
drusilla  
Da vinci, I mean. Like 1/2 hour ago...

Good movie, I like a lot: quite messy at the end, but they were more
loyal than they are with the average HP movie.

You know, I am catholic, lightly conservative about certain stuff, and I
didn't find myself offended in any way: all the opposite; the movie
clearly says that it doesn't matter what Jesus is, but what he said and
what he means to People. Actually, those defenders of the 'theory in
question', are portrayed as nuts.

--


__

*** Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com ***
Re: [OT] I saw it.. [message #269715 ] Fr, 19 Mai 2006 05:45
Freezer  
If I don't respond to this drusilla post, the terrorists win.

> Da vinci, I mean. Like 1/2 hour ago...
>
> Good movie, I like a lot: quite messy at the end, but they were more
> loyal than they are with the average HP movie.
>
> You know, I am catholic, lightly conservative about certain stuff, and
> I didn't find myself offended in any way: all the opposite; the movie
> clearly says that it doesn't matter what Jesus is, but what he said
> and what he means to People. Actually, those defenders of the 'theory
> in question', are portrayed as nuts.
>

I LOL in the face of those getting their panties in a twist over Da
Vinci. These are the same type kneejerk asshats that saved "The Last
Temptation of Christ" from the arthouse oblivion it deserved.

--
My name is:
____ _
/ ___| | |
| |__ _ __ ___ ___ ____ ___ _ __ | |
| __|| '__/ _ \/ _ \/_ // _ \| '__|| |
| | | | __/ __/ / /| __/| | |_|
|_| |_| \___|\___||___|\___||_| (_)
And my anti-drug is porn.
2006 RSPW March Melee Champion
http://www.geocities.com/mysterysciencefreezer
http://freezer818.livejournal.com/
Re: [OT] I saw it.. [message #269777 ] Sa, 20 Mai 2006 05:07
kilroy  
"Freezer" <freezer88 [at] hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97C7E7D78213Cfreezer88hotmailcom [at] 65.24.7.27...
> If I don't respond to this drusilla post, the terrorists win.
>
>> Da vinci, I mean. Like 1/2 hour ago...
>>
>> Good movie, I like a lot: quite messy at the end, but they were more
>> loyal than they are with the average HP movie.
>>
>> You know, I am catholic, lightly conservative about certain stuff, and
>> I didn't find myself offended in any way: all the opposite; the movie
>> clearly says that it doesn't matter what Jesus is, but what he said
>> and what he means to People. Actually, those defenders of the 'theory
>> in question', are portrayed as nuts.
>>
>
> I LOL in the face of those getting their panties in a twist over Da
> Vinci. These are the same type kneejerk asshats that saved "The Last
> Temptation of Christ" from the arthouse oblivion it deserved.
>
> --
You'd think that people would have figured out by now that the more they
crusade against a book, TV show, or movie, the more they stimulate interest
in said book, TV show, or movie. See "Married...With Children" at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Married_With_Children#The_Rakol ta_Boycott as a
perfect example of what I mean.
--
Kilroy was here.
"Always blame it on the guy who doesn't speak English." - Homer Simpson
Re: I saw it.. [message #269810 ] Sa, 20 Mai 2006 17:32
bdurrettccci  
Kilroy wrote:
> "Freezer" <freezer88 [at] hotSPAMTHISmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns97C7E7D78213Cfreezer88hotmailcom [at] 65.24.7.27...
> > If I don't respond to this drusilla post, the terrorists win.
> >
> >> Da vinci, I mean. Like 1/2 hour ago...
> >>
> >> Good movie, I like a lot: quite messy at the end, but they were more
> >> loyal than they are with the average HP movie.
> >>
> >> You know, I am catholic, lightly conservative about certain stuff, and
> >> I didn't find myself offended in any way: all the opposite; the movie
> >> clearly says that it doesn't matter what Jesus is, but what he said
> >> and what he means to People. Actually, those defenders of the 'theory
> >> in question', are portrayed as nuts.
> >>
> >
> > I LOL in the face of those getting their panties in a twist over Da
> > Vinci. These are the same type kneejerk asshats that saved "The Last
> > Temptation of Christ" from the arthouse oblivion it deserved.
> >
> > --
> You'd think that people would have figured out by now that the more they
> crusade against a book, TV show, or movie, the more they stimulate interest
> in said book, TV show, or movie. See "Married...With Children" at
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Married_With_Children#The_Rakol ta_Boycott as a
> perfect example of what I mean.
> --

I agree. All the boycott stuff tends to backfire. But, my former
employer Campus Crusade for Christ is taking a different slant on DVC.
They are trying to use it as a way to start discussions on things like
the reliability of the Bible. Here is a web site:

http://www.pcgmedia.org/davincianswers.html

I think it is a better approach than just condemning it. Start a
dialog instead. Obviously the same approach would work with the HP
stuff. Read it and discuss it rather than try to ban it without even
reading it. Of course there are limits. Should we watch all the
different kinds of pornography so we can intelligently discuss it?
Probably not, due to the potential damage to ourselves.

- Bobby
Vorheriges Thema:Shouldn't they be called
Nächstes Thema:who likes emma watson?
Gehe zu:
  


aktuelle Zeit: Sa Mai 26 07:47:07 CEST 2012

Insgesamt benötigte Zeit, um die Seite zu erzeugen: 0,07098 Sekunden
.:: Startseite - Hinweise - Impressum ::.

Powered